PIL instrument(s)
Brussels I
Case number and/or case name
BGH, 23.10.2012 – X ZR 157/11
Details of the court
Germany, Third Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels I
Article 15
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph c
Article 16
Paragraph 1
Article 22
Paragraph 1
Date of the judgement
22 October 2012
Appeal history
CJEU's case law cited by the court
Summary
The defendant based in Denmark offers holiday homes in catalogues in Germany. The plaintiff rented a holiday home in Belgium which showed several defects the defendant didn’t fix. The plaintiff left the place and claimed for repayment and compensation. The court decided that there was no exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 22 no. 1 Brussels I. It held that the rule didn’t applied to the case that a commercial tour operator and a consumer concluded a contract on the renting of a house and several supplementary services such as information and advices. The judgment was made in accordance with the jurisdiction of the CJEU in Hacker (C-280/90). It can therefore be considered correct.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team