PIL instrument(s)
Brussels I
Case number and/or case name
OLG Kalrsruhe, 9.8.2006 – 19 U 8/05
Details of the court
Germany, Second Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels I
Article 5
Paragraph 3
Article 15
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 3
Article 17
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 3
Article 22
Paragraph 1
Article 23
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph c
Date of the judgement
08 August 2006
Appeal history
CJEU's case law cited by the court
Summary
The parties argued about damage claims from a time sharing contract. The contract has been concluded in Germany and regarded a holiday apartment in Spain. The first instance court denied the international jurisdiction of German courts. The Higher Regional court affirmed this decision. It held that an action regarding the termination of a purchase contract on time sharing rights didn’t fall within the scope of application of Art. 22 no. 1 Brussels I. The action according to the court didn’t concern a right in rem in immovable property as required in Art. 22 Brussels I. The court’s decision stays in accordance with settled case law. In order to assume international jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 22 no. 1 Brussels I it is required that the action directly concerns rights in rem. The existence of a simple relation to such a right is not sufficient. In the present case however the action mainly concerned the termination of the contract and damage claims resulting from it. Therefore, the decision is correct.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team