PIL instrument(s)
Brussels IIa
Case number and/or case name
L.M. v. V.D.Z J.B., V.D.Z. J. and Z.A. - Antwerpen, 23 December 2011
Details of the court
Belgium, Second Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels IIa
Article 15
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph d
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph e
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 6
Date of the judgement
22 December 2011
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
Mr. J.B. v.d.Z. and Ms. M. L. have a child, B., who was born on 17 May 2005. In 2011, the Antwerp Youth Court granted access rights to the father and the grandparents of the child during one weekend per month and during school holidays. Ms. M. L. filed an appeal against this decision of the Antwerp Youth Court, requesting the Court to transfer the case to the Courts of ‘s Hertogenbosch in The Netherlands on the basis of Art. 15 Brussels II Regulation. During the proceedings before the court of first instance, the mother lived with her daughter in Belgium. The Belgian Court therefore accepted its jurisdiction. However, the mother and her daughter later moved to the Netherlands. All the parties are Dutch nationals and live in the Netherlands. All parties request a transfer. Therefore, the Belgian Court decides to transfer the case to the Dutch courts. The Belgian and Dutch courts had direct contact concerning the transfer (cf. Art. 15(6)). Short critique This is a good example of the mechanism to transfer the case to a court better placed to hear the case.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team