PIL instrument(s)
Brussels I
Case number and/or case name
Archivision Lim BVBA v. Jan Lieuwma Vormgeving BV - 04/4741 - Kh. Hasselt, 16 February 2005
Details of the court
Belgium, First Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels I
Article 3
Paragraph 1
Article 23
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph c
Date of the judgement
15 February 2005
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
The court applies the first hypothesis of Art. 23 Brussels I Regulation. A forum selection clause can take different forms. Where a choice of forum clause is included in the general conditions on the reverse side of a signed contract, the signed text must refer explicitly to the general conditions on the back. No explicit reference is needed to the forum selection clause itself, taking into account the frequency of such a clause in the general conditions, especially in international transactions. Since this is the case here, the clause is valid and enforceable against the defendant. The Belgian courts have jurisdiction. Short Critique The court correctly applies Brussels I and in particular the Segoura case of the ECJ, but without expressly referring to this case law.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team