PIL instrument(s)
Brussels IIa
Case number and/or case name
S (Brussels II (Revised): Enforcement of Contact Order), Re [2008] Fam. Law 622
Details of the court
England and Wales, Second Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels IIa
Article 8
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Article 9
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Article 16
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Article 23
Paragraph a
Article 26
Date of the judgement
27 July 2007
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
The parties married in Poland. They had a child, V, who was 6-year old when her parents divorced in Poland. The English proceedings were in respect of a contact order which was made in Poland. The contact order in question was from May 2005. In June 2005, the mother brought legally the child with her in England. The father applied to enforce the Polish contract order in England. This was an appeal from an English order, recognising the Polish contact order, and directing its registration. The father submitted that, despite the change of circumstances, the Polish contract order should be recognised and enforced in England. The English court refused the father’s application, holding that it was not appropriate for it to enforce the Polish order which was not in the child’s best interest. Although the English court could not review the substance of a foreign order under Article 26, the English court had jurisdiction under Article 8 to make or to vary or to discharge order from another jurisdiction. In view of this, it was held that there should be a number of periods of visiting contacts in England.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team