PIL instrument(s)
Brussels I
Case number and/or case name
Comisiones Obreras de Extremadura.Roj: STS 2306/2015 - ECLI:ES:TS:2015:2306
Details of the court
Spain, Second Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels I
Article 19
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph b
Date of the judgement
19 April 2015
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
Summary
Conflict of jurisdiction based on the application of Brussels I Regulation provisions. The matter of the case is a labour dispute and a conflict of jurisdiction. The defendant (a Spanish company) is sued by the Works Committee for a change in the contractual working conditions of 900 employees. Six of those 900 workers provide services out of Spain. Court decision: Spanish courts are competent to decide on the case according to art. 19.2 of Brussels I Regulation (“An employer domiciled in a Member State may be sued in the courts of the Member State where he is domiciled”, that is to say, Spain). In order to decide, the court applies Brussels I Regulation provisions on jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment. The court cites CJEU´s case law on the interpretation of the concept of “domicile of the defendant” (Date: 17-06-1992, Case Hante, C- 26/91; Date: 13-06-1993, case Mulos C-125/92; Date: 22-05-2008, case Glaxosmithkline and Laboratoires Glaxosmithkline, C-462/06.) Appeal history (not available in the database): First instance court: Sala de lo Social del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Extremadura. Spain. Date:19-12-2013

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team