PIL instrument(s)
Brussels IIa
Case number and/or case name
ITT20110802 Cass. n. 16864/2011
Details of the court
Italy, Third Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels IIa
Article 13
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Article 15
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph d
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph e
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 6
Date of the judgement
01 August 2011
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
For the purpose of establishing jurisdiction in case of wrongful removal of a child, a change of the place of habitual residence of the child that occurs after the lodging of the relevant application is irrelevant if it is a consequence of provisional measures issued in urgent cases. In fact, the provisions conferring jurisdiction to the courts of the State where the child is present, such as Articles 13 and 15 of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 and Article 12 of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on International Child Abduction, derogate from the ordinary rule whereby jurisdiction shall be determined at the time of lodging of the document instituting the proceedings (so-called perpetuatio iurisdictionis principle) and are laid down to deal with exceptional circumstances.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team