PIL instrument(s)
Brussels IIa
Case number and/or case name
Lorenza vs. Plácido.Roj: SAP T 1827/2013 - ECLI:ES:APT:2013:1827
Details of the court
Spain, Second Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels IIa
Article 12
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 4
Article 15
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph d
Paragraph 3 SubParagraph e
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 6
Date of the judgement
03 November 2013
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
The matter of the case is a parental responsibility dispute raised before Spanish courts . Interpretative application of Brussels II a Regulation provisions. Key facts: Interpretation by the court of the concept of “best benefit” of the child according to Brussels II a Regulation. Court decision: in order to decide, the court makes an interpretation of the concept of “best benefit” of the child according to arts. 12 and 15 of Brussels II a Regulation. The court makes an interpretative application of Brussels II a provisions on prorogation of jurisdiction and transfer to a court better placed to hear the case. Appeal history (not available in the database): Court decision: Juzgado de 1ª Instancia nº 3 de El Vendrell (Spain) (First instance) Date: 2010

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team