PIL instrument(s)
Brussels IIa
Case number and/or case name
RD (Child Abduction) (Brussels II Revised: Articles 11(7) and 19), Re [2008] Fam. Law 1078
Details of the court
England and Wales, First Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels IIa
Article 8
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Article 10
Paragraph a
Paragraph b SubParagraph i
Paragraph b SubParagraph ii
Paragraph b SubParagraph iii
Paragraph b SubParagraph iv
Article 11
Paragraph 7
Article 19
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 3
Date of the judgement
15 August 2008
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
The proceedings were in respect of a child, R. The child was born in England. The parties had lived in England together. The parties had separated. There had been parental responsibility proceedings in England. The English court had made contact orders for the father. Several years later, the mother and the child, R, went both to Portugal, and did not come back in England. In Portugal, the mother commenced parental responsibility proceedings. The Portuguese court assumed jurisdiction. The father’s application for a summary return of the child to England was late. A non-return order was made by the Portuguese court. In England, the father made an application for return under Article 11(7) of Brussels IIa. The English court refused to exercise jurisdiction under Article 11(7), holding that it could only do so, if the foreign court had made its non-return order on the ground of Article 13 rather than on the basis of Article 12 of the Hague Convention. Further, since the Portuguese court was first seised with the parental responsibility proceedings, the English court had to stay its proceedings under the Children Act 1989.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team