PIL instrument(s)
Brussels I
Case number and/or case name
BGH, 16.09.2015 – VIII ZR 17/15
Details of the court
Germany, Third Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels I
Article 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 2 SubParagraph d
Paragraph 3
Article 23
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph c
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 5
Date of the judgement
15 September 2015
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
Summary
The plaintiff is an insolvency administrator administrating a German company. The defendant is a Dutch company. The plaintiff is suing for payment. The question before the court was whether the proceeding was an annex proceeding of the insolvency under the Insolvency Regulation or a normal civil proceeding under the Brussels I regulation and therefore whether German or Dutch courts are competent. The court decided the claim does not fall under an annex competence regarding the Insolvency Regulation but constitutes a civil or commercial matter under the Brussels I regulation. Therefore, the Dutch courts were competent according to a choice of forum clause under Art. 23 Brussels I.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team