PIL instrument(s)
Brussels IIa
Case number and/or case name
unknown - 08/6070/A - Civ. Liège, 22 April 2009
Details of the court
Belgium, First Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels IIa
Article 3
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 5
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 6
Date of the judgement
21 April 2009
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
The applicant has Belgian nationality while the defendant is Moroccan. The parties were married in Rabat on 11 August 2005 and their marriage was transcribed in the registers of Liège on 22 March 2007. In 2008, the applicant repudiated his wife in Morocco, but the repudiation was not recognised in Belgium. The spouses never lived together in Belgium so that they did not establish their habitual residence there. Nevertheless, the Belgian Courts have jurisdiction based on Art. 3(1)(a), first and sixth indent Brussels IIbis Regulation. The domicile of the applicant has been in Belgium for more than one year before he initiated proceedings. The defendant was not present at the proceedings, and she wrote to the court explaining that she had not obtained a visum to travel to Belgium. She did not request a postponement of the proceedings. SHORT CRITIQUE The Court correctly applies the Brussels IIa Regulation. The Court could have just applied Art. 3(1)(a), sixth indent instead of referring to both indents five and six.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team