PIL instrument(s)
Brussels IIa
Case number and/or case name
A. v. Ad. - Civ. Bruxelles, 9 November 2007
Details of the court
Belgium, First Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels IIa
Article 3
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 1
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 2
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 3
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 4
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 5
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 6
Article 17
Date of the judgement
08 November 2007
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
Mrs. A. applies for a divorce. Pursuant to Art. 17 Brussels IIa, the Court shall examine its jurisdiction of its own motion. Mrs. A. has Belgian nationality while Mr. Ad. is Moroccan. The applicant is habitually resident in Belgium and resided there for at least six months immediately before the application was made. The Belgian courts have jurisdiction. SHORT CRITIQUE This is a correct application of the Brussels IIa Regulation, although we notice two things: - The court does not examine whether the applicant is actually habitually resident in Belgium, but states is as a fact. - The court does not expressly refer to the indent of art. 3(1)(a) on which it bases its jurisdiction.

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team