PIL instrument(s)
Brussels I
Case number and/or case name
Graciela vs. Alonso (2).Roj: AAP M 2528/2011 - ECLI:ES:APM:2011:2528A
Details of the court
Spain, Second Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels I
Article 38
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Article 39
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Date of the judgement
14 February 2011
Appeal history
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
Application of Brussels I Regulation provisions to the enforcement of a foreign court decision in Spain. The matter of the case is the enforcement of an Austrian court decision on maintenance (child of a divorced couple). The father is a Spanish diplomatic living in New Zealand for employment reasons. The mother is from the USA and lives in France. A first instance Spanish court rejected the enforcement because the father was not living in Spain (decision based in Brussels II a Regulation). Court decision: the first instance court decision must not be taken into consideration. Art. 1.3 e) of Brussels II a Regulation excludes maintenance matters from its scope of application. Spanish courts are competent to enforce the foreign court decision according to arts. 38 and 39 of Brussels I Regulation (the habitual residence of Spanish diplomatic officers is the last one registered in Spain –in the case of reference the habitual residence was Madrid-). Appeal history (not available in the database): Court decision: Juzgado de Primera Instancia nº 80 de los de Madrid (Spain) (First instance) Date: 13-05-2010

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team