PIL instrument(s)
Brussels I
Brussels IIa
Case number and/or case name
Ramona vs. Romeo. Ref. JUR\2013\219692
Details of the court
Spain, Second Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels I
Article 5
Paragraph 2
Brussels IIa
Article 3
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 1
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 2
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 3
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 4
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 5
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 6
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2
Article 8
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Article 61
Paragraph a
Date of the judgement
02 May 2013
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
Conflict of jurisdiction on the basis of Brussels II a Regulation provisions. Key facts: Divorce case in Spain beween Spanish inidviduals. Court decision: Spanish courts are competent to decide on parental responsibility matters according to arts. 8 and 61 a) of Brussels II a Regulation. Spanish courts are also competent to decide on maintenance matters according to art 5.2 of Brussels I Regulation. The court applies general rules on jurisdiction in matters relating to divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment. The court took into account Brussels II a Regulation provisions on jurisdiction that shall lie with the courts of the Member State in whose territory the spouses are habitually resident. The court also applies general rules on jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility over a child who is habitually resident in a Member State at the time the court is seized, and in matters relating to maintenance, the rules to determine the courts for the place where the maintenance creditor is domiciled or habitually resident. Appeal history (not available in the database):

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team