PIL instrument(s)
Brussels I
Brussels IIa
Case number and/or case name
Marisa vs. Maximino. Roj: SAP V 4863/2013 - ECLI:ES:APV:2013:4863
Details of the court
Spain, Second Instance
Articles referred to by the court
Brussels I
Article 5
Paragraph 2
Brussels IIa
Article 3
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 1
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 2
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 3
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 4
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 5
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph a Indent 6
Paragraph 1 SubParagraph b
Paragraph 2
Article 8
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Date of the judgement
23 October 2013
Appeal history
None
CJEU's case law cited by the court
None
Summary
Conflict of jurisdiction on the basis of Brussels II a Regulation provisions. Kat facts: Divorce case between spouses from Chile living in Spain. Court decision: Spanish courts are competent to decide on divorce and parental responsibility matters according to arts. 3 and 8 of Brussels II a Regulation. Spanish courts are also competent to decide on maintenance matters according to art. 5.2 of Brussels I Regulation. The court applies general rules on jurisdiction in matters relating to divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment. The court took into account Brussels II a Regulation provisions on jurisdiction that shall lie with the courts of the Member State in whose territory the spouses are habitually resident. The court applies general rules on jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility over a child who is habitually resident in a Member State at the time the court is seized and and in matters relating to maintenance, the rules to determine the courts for the place where the maintenance creditor is domiciled or habitually resident. Appeal history (not available in the database): Court decision: JUZGADO DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA E INSTRUCCION NUMERO 4 DE LLIRIA (Spain) (First instance) Date: 26-02-2013

This website is written and maintained by the University of Aberdeen's Research Applications and Data Management Team